Offender Viado submitted his Answer throughout the more than-entitled cases. In the two cases he admits the fact that concerning the filing of the Petition on the Issuance of the latest owner’s copies out of TCT No. T-14466 and you can 14467, but denies with was the cause of execution out-of an alternate power off attorneys to have plus in account of people. The guy said that it actually was Marilou Soriano who passed so you can him a prepared petition that have annexes on that to own him so you can signal and thereafter for their particular chose counsel to file for the legal. Which plan is actually said from the Marilou Soriano and Viado enjoys concurred as long as Marilou Soriano made available to your plaintiff Jacinto Soriano, following to your a controls chair, exactly who she produced once the their dad. On the other hand Viado accessible to aid in reconstituting new shed titles having a fee off P80,. Viado says that he was only named about Unique Stamina out-of Lawyer that was already notarized and you may linked to the Petition, x x x.

Once summons by the publication, defendants Jose during the Municipal Instance Zero. 6210-R and you can Hufana inside the Municipal Instance No. 6211-Roentgen don’t file the particular answers. Upon actions from the plaintiffs, Jose and you may Hufana have been .

The latest told you mortgage is covered by the a real estate financial more the fresh TCT Zero

In its Respond to for the Civil Case Zero. 6211-R, properly registered promptly, BPI acknowledges sentences 1 and you may 8 of your own Criticism and you can denies the rest of the matter allegations on the Grievance. Section eight, pertains to the newest plaintiffs assertion that Petition with the issuance of brand new owner’s duplicate copy away from TCT Nos. T-14466 and you will T-14467 might have been supplied hence an order is actually issued saying that the customer’s content of your foregoing headings was lost and no force and you may feeling. 14466 which have BPI on the level of Several Billion Pesos. Using affirmative protections. BPI slates that it provides taken care of Hufana completely a good trust, and thus, its an excellent mortgagee within the good faith entitled to the protection within the rules. Next, they claims that it is not essential commit not in the four comers of Hufana’s label, hence for the the face suggests no defect. The borrowed funds records is actually notarized data files hence, beneath the rules, are entitled to good assumption out of volume and you may authenticity.

Upon motion off plaintiffs properly supplied of the courtroom, an amended Problem try submitted from the plaintiffs impleading Maria Luzviminda Patimo because the accused title loan rates Wyoming within the Municipal Circumstances No. 6210-Roentgen.

Within the Means to fix new Amended Grievance, accused Patimo rejects the material accusations about Revised Problem. Given that Unique and you can Affirmative Protections, Patimo so-called you to definitely since , she try contacted by accused Jose which required a loan and you will given due to the fact security TCT Zero. 85840. Before going into the told you loan application from Jose, Patimo went to ensure and look the aforementioned-said identity toward Sign in of Deeds out of Baguio Area. 85840.

Came across that there no burden or any other liens to your title provided by Jose, Patimo provided the loan taken out by Jose on count of one Mil Peso

Inside the Civil Situation Zero. 6210-Roentgen, the fact was hereby dismissed regarding defendant Patimo getting run out of regarding quality. Since defendants Jose and you can Viado, he or she is hereby purchased to help you solidarity afford the plaintiffs the quantity of a single million pesos once the and also by technique for genuine damages; three hundred thousand pesos using moral problems; 2 hundred thousand pesos once the by way of exemplary damage; and you can 25 [sic] thousand pesos because the attorney’s costs and also to afford the cost of the latest suit.